Re: Perl / mod_perl / PostgreSQL was: Good open source

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perl / mod_perl / PostgreSQL was: Good open source
Date: 2003-12-10 18:48:08
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0312101040360.15766-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9 Dec 2003, Harald Fuchs wrote:

> > Though I still don't see why should pick mod_perl over
> PersistentPerl, if I > were to build a web-app? I have used
> HTML::Template for, well, HTML templates; > though it is not exactly
> pretty, it works as intended.
>
> Do you mean ``<TMPL_VAR NAME="myvar">''?
>
> That's the reason why I switched to the Template Toolkit where you
> just write ``[%myvar%]''.

I have used both. Template-Toolkit because of recommendations of 'Perl'
people and HTML::Template on a Windows system when I had problems
installing Template-Toolkit. Both add a some functionality that is IMO a
little heavy for most needs.
Oh yeah I'm using the Template-Toolkit where I'm building standard
text-only emails which it seemed to fit quite well and HTML::Template for
... HTML.

Cheers,
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-12-10 19:06:45 Re: [NOVICE] PostgreSQL Training
Previous Message Joel Rodrigues 2003-12-10 18:28:50 Re: spelling errors in query terms