From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL) |
Date: | 2003-09-19 15:49:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309190949180.14562-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > > ... Being honest and fair will win
> > > hearts and minds, and when they need the Saturn 4 instead of the Estes
> > > rocket, they'll remember who to come to.
> >
> > I like this analogy, though maybe you've overstretched. Perhaps:
> >
> > MySQL = Estes. Put in InnoDB, and you have a D engine ... but it's
> > still a model rocket.
> >
> > Postgres = Titan II. Can boost LEO missions or small interplanetary
> > probes. Never mind its ICBM heritage ;-)
>
> All US (government) and Soviet/Russian rockets have ICBM roots.
>
> > Oracle = Saturn IV. Can take you to the moon ... if you can afford
> > the price tag.
>
> What's a Saturn IV? Do you mean the Saturn V?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | btober | 2003-09-19 15:51:30 | Re: Column defaults fail with rules on view |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 15:34:34 | Re: Trouble with some concepts |