From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bupp Phillips <hello(at)noname(dot)com> |
Cc: | psql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What is the fastest way to get a resultset |
Date: | 2003-08-27 19:20:24 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308271320130.1781-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Bupp Phillips wrote:
> I'm very new to Postgresql, so don't beat me up to bad if you see a problem,
> just Inform me what I've done wrong.
>
> I'm use Postgresql 7.2 (PeerDirect's Windows port) on Win2000 384MB RAM 10GB
> of Free space 800 Mhz, using the ODBC driver 7.03.01.00.
>
> I have a table that has 103,000 records in it (record size is about 953
> bytes) and when I do a select all (select * from <table>) it takes a
> whopping 30 secs for the data to return!!
>
> SQLServer on the other hand takes 6 secs, but you can also use what is
> called a firehose cursor, which will return the data in < 1 sec.
>
> I have done everything that I know how to speed this up, does anyone have
> any advise?
Have you tried declaring a cursor?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | N.K. | 2003-08-27 19:28:18 | Pg_dump : Can I specify the Password ? |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-08-27 18:54:43 | Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases? |