Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: <wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com>
Cc: "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date: 2002-12-04 23:13:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0212041611250.15665-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com wrote:

>
> Thanks for your summary and very constructive criticism. I've also found
> the postgresql community to be very helpful and supportive. (Thanks
> everyone!)
>
> I want to add something with regard to security and running as root.
> First, if postgresql runs as root and is bound to an internal interface,
> someone getting root access to the box through a postgresql exploit would
> have access to everything on that box, including other interfaces. Second,
> many security threats and attacks are launched from within companies, or
> from within corporate firewalls. You need to guard against these as well.
> This could happen either because an employee or contractor decides to work
> against the company for whatever reason, or because another box on the LAN
> is compromised from outside, and is then used to attack other servers
> within the LAN. You can never have too many layers of security, especially
> when you get an extra layer for the low low price of adding another user
> and group. :-)

also, think of a mistake with the copy command:

copy table to /etc/passwd;
or
copy table to /dev/hda;

As postgres, no big deal. Access denied. As root, kaboom.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Shraibman 2002-12-04 23:44:14 Re: performance tuning
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2002-12-04 23:12:44 Re: performance tuning