Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Date: 2002-11-21 20:09:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211309330.23651-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > concurrency issues. ;-)
>
> Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.

Isn't that what Bruce just said? ;^)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-21 20:23:50 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message dev 2002-11-21 19:35:41 Re: &main::execute undefined?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-21 20:23:50 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-21 19:30:14 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-21 20:23:50 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-21 19:30:14 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence