Re: SQLCODE==-209

From: John Summerfield <pgtest(at)os2(dot)ami(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, John Summerfield <pgtest(at)os2(dot)ami(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLCODE==-209
Date: 2001-10-16 12:32:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0110162030370.17241-100000@dugite.os2.ami.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> I have added documentation for code 209. Looks like there are other
> undocumented ones. Should we document them all?

If you're asking me, I'm all in favour of documenting them;-)

I'm not a fan of "Read the source," though I do it if I'm desperate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-16 13:55:59 Re: ecpg - GRANT bug
Previous Message Lee Kindness 2001-10-16 09:27:42 Re: ecpg - GRANT bug

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-16 13:01:09 Re: FW: [HACKERS] Problem on AIX with current
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-10-16 12:06:26 Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.