| From: | Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn(at)yahoo(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | andy <andy(at)exkom(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL |
| Date: | 2001-09-03 19:34:37 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0109032131340.8917-100000@sensenet.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table using and
> found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
> similar PERL routine the following results :
> PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
How did you start the tests? For Java to really show it's strengh it
usually requires a few warm-up runs, so that the JIT or Hotspot optimizers
get started.
But I still wouldn't be surprised if perl was faster. I'm sure it's easier
to write a DBI/DBD driver than a JDBC driver.
/Anders
_____________________________________________________________________
A n d e r s B e n g t s s o n ndrsbngtssn(at)yahoo(dot)se
Stockholm, Sweden
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Quentin DELANCE | 2001-09-03 20:05:36 | Re: RE : ? (question mark) characters |
| Previous Message | Joe Shevland | 2001-09-03 18:00:07 | Re: JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL |