Re: Allowing usernames in pg_hba.conf

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allowing usernames in pg_hba.conf
Date: 2002-03-11 02:32:02
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203102128280.684-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> This is definitely stressing pg_hba past its design limits --- heck, the
> name of the file isn't even appropriate anymore, if usernames are part
> of the match criteria. Rather than contorting things to maintain a
> pretense of backwards compatibility, it's time to abandon the current
> file format, change the name, and start over.

The pg_hba.conf thing is slowly growing to become a bad excuse for a
completely general authentication system, such as PAM. Instead of
creating our own, maybe we could rip off the "BSD authentication" system
from some free *BSD. I haven't seen it, but it's supposed to be like (or
"better than") PAM.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-11 02:32:03 Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-11 02:28:49 Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output