| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: elog() patch |
| Date: | 2002-03-02 03:21:22 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0203012220040.687-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe I have the ordering wrong for server_min_messages. Perhaps it
> > > should be:
> > >
> > > DEBUG5-1, INFO, NOTICE/WARNING, ERROR, LOG, FATAL, PANIC
> > >
> > > Nothing prevents us from doing that. Well, anyway, not sure how much I
> > > like it but I throw it out as an idea.
> >
> > Ah, yes, that sounds optimal to me.
>
> What do others think of this. I can easily do it.
I'd rather keep NOTICE instead of WARNING. It's just to keep things
looking familiar a bit.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2002-03-02 13:19:23 | Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life : NEWS!!! |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-03-02 02:29:53 | Re: timestamp_part() bug? |