Re: PgManage update

From: "Command Prompt, Inc(dot)" <pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PgManage update
Date: 2002-02-19 06:24:08
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202182223210.30863-100000@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello,

No. This is not Open Source Software (mentioned previously). At some
point we may Open Source it, especially as Mammoth and Herd come to
fruition but we have to make back our investment :)

J

On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> Is this open-source software?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Command Prompt, Inc. wrote:
> > Currently we have the following working:
> >
> > Multiple server connection: 100%
> > SSL Connectivity for secure management: 100%
> > Over the Wire backup: 100%
> > Over the Wire restore: 100%
> > User management: 100%
> > Group Management: 100%
> > Query exectution: 50%
> > Database management: 75%
> > Table Management: 75%
>
>

--
--
by way of pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com
http://www.postgresql.info/
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-19 07:26:38 Re: [GENERAL] Extending PostgreSQL
Previous Message Command Prompt, Inc. 2002-02-19 06:23:06 Re: SQL: Are the "" around table & coloumnames necessary?