Re: Licensing issues including another projects source

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Licensing issues including another projects source
Date: 2001-11-05 20:04:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111051714510.617-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Cramer writes:

> I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with
> this clause?

It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver to
mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and
impractical. More generally, it would introduce a divergence in licensing
in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-11-05 20:05:03 Re: compiler warnings in ODBC
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-11-05 20:00:39 Re: compiler warnings in ODBC