| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Flancer <huongch(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
| Date: | 2001-10-17 20:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110172025340.628-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Break the SQL code that has been implemented for prior versions??
> > Bummer ;((.
>
> Yes, but we don't follow the MySQL behavior, which we copied when we
> added LIMIT. Seems we should agree with their implementation.
Isn't it much worse to not follow PostgreSQL behaviour than to not follow
MySQL behaviour?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-17 20:46:29 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-17 20:36:13 | Re: Blank SQL insert statements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-17 20:37:06 | Re: Package support for Postgres |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-17 20:34:47 | Re: compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed |