Thomas Lockhart writes:
> Oh yeah. We don't have a date_part(units, time) function defined, so it
> is getting converted to interval (which in other contexts *does* have
> some usefulness as a "time equivalent").
You're going to have an extremely hard time convincing me of that.
> We could fairly easily define a date_part() for the time and timetz data
> types.
I had figured that time would be cast to timestamp. Which is probably
what it used to do.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter