Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-15 21:55:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108152355040.677-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > No, the problem is that you are not supposed to have include files in the
> > backend subtree. I'm surprised the code builds at all.
>
> Oh, yes, I had moved md5.h to libpq because I needed md5.c. I should
> have just pointed to libpq/md5.h. Anyway, it is better in crypt.h
> anyway.

No, the solution is to move md5.h into include/libpq.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Nasser 2001-08-15 22:01:58 Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-15 21:52:59 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords