Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators?
Date: 2001-08-14 20:48:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108142246370.677-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> We could try to force-convert the result of an SQL function to the right
> thing, I suppose, but I'm worried that that might mask programmer errors
> more than it helps.

What I had in mind was to allow type conversion between the same
TypeCategory(). The SQL function analyzer is extraordinarily picky:

create function test(int) returns varchar as '
select substring(''PostgreSQL'' from $1);
' language sql;
ERROR: return type mismatch in function: declared to return character
varying, returns text

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Wood 2001-08-14 20:54:11 Re: cmd-line interface
Previous Message Blue Berry 2001-08-14 20:38:03 Probably an old bug, but here you go anyway...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-14 21:05:16 Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators?
Previous Message Steve Howe 2001-08-14 20:25:43 Retriving users from group ?...