Tom Lane writes:
> > Also, what is LANCOMPILER for? If it's just a comment we ought to use
> > pg_description.
>
> I think the original idea might have been to someday support
> auto-building of compiled functions.
That's what I though, too. My concern is mostly that this clause should
be optional, because right now it needs to be filled with in with useless
stuff.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter