From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: elog(NOIND)? |
Date: | 2001-06-07 14:40:08 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106071635280.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> While you're at it, rearrange the numeric order of the elog levels to be
> sensible. There are some bizarrely-coded tests in elog.c that could be
> simplified if severity levels had the obvious ordering.
Okay, but I'm not sure there will be a total ordering forever. For
example, it's pretty useless to log user-level errors like "syntax error"
to the server log by default. There needs to be more flexibility.
Does anyone foresee a problem with making them an enum?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Stosberg | 2001-06-07 14:40:40 | Re: behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Standards |
Previous Message | Robert Forsman | 2001-06-07 14:37:36 | Re: Re: Daily Digest V1 #1428 |