Re: Re: Daily Digest V1 #1428

From: Robert Forsman <thoth(at)purplefrog(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Daily Digest V1 #1428
Date: 2001-06-07 14:37:36
Message-ID: 200106071437.KAA01276@nile.purplefrog.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> ,in message <3B1EEF88(dot)7E086190(at)tm(dot)ee>, wrote:

> Robert Forsman wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't help either when your library has
> > bugs that prevent returning an accurate count of rows affected either.
>
> So does it have such bugs ?

Postgres 7 fixed that JDBC bug. Now we just need NOC to upgrade our
field servers.

--
Bob Forsman thoth(at)gainesville(dot)fl(dot)us
http://www.gainesville.fl.us/~thoth/

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-07 14:40:08 Re: elog(NOIND)?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-07 14:34:33 Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Stand ards