Re: Smaller access privilege changes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Smaller access privilege changes
Date: 2001-05-24 18:41:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105242040550.757-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Elphick writes:

> COPY FROM should require either INSERT or UPDATE or both according to
> what rows are being copied. If a copied primary key already exists,
> that will be an update.

No, it will be an error.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-24 18:58:01 Re: Bug#98565: postgresql logs notices with GMT timestamps in syslog (fwd)
Previous Message David Kuczek 2001-05-24 18:17:15 Re: Re: Shared memory for RH Linux 7.1