Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Vladimir V(dot) Zolotych" <gsmith(at)eurocom(dot)od(dot)ua>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-05 21:39:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105052337350.769-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vladimir V. Zolotych writes:

> I see the following
>
> proba=> select * from pg_language;
> lanname |lanispl|lanpltrusted|lanplcallfoid|lancompiler
> --------+-------+------------+-------------+--------------
> internal|f |f | 0|n/a
> lisp |f |f | 0|/usr/ucb/liszt
[...]

This must have been an artifact from the time when part of the Postgres
system was written in Lisp. A Lisp procedural language never actually
existed in PostgreSQL.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2001-05-05 22:43:51 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-05-05 20:57:56 Re: elog(LOG), elog(DEBUG)