Re: Real/effective user

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Real/effective user
Date: 2001-04-18 19:36:34
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0104182119290.762-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> 1. "real user" = what you originally authenticated to the postmaster.
>
> 2. "session user" = what you can SET if your real identity is a superuser.
>
> 3. "current user" = effective userid for permission checks.

We could have a Boolean variable "authenticated user is superuser" which
would serve as the permission to execute SET SESSION AUTHENTICATION, while
we would not actually be making the identity of the real/authenticated
user available (so as to not confuse things unnecessarily).

> if a setuid function
> does a CREATE, shouldn't the created object be owned by the setuid user?
> I'm not sure that I *want* to accept the SQL spec on this point.

Me neither.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-18 19:44:13 Re: Modified driver to better handle NULL values...y
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-18 19:34:14 Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?