Re: Truncation of char, varchar types

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Truncation of char, varchar types
Date: 2001-04-10 17:05:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0104101904050.1403-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Myers writes:

> We have noticed here also that object (e.g. table) names get truncated
> in some places and not others. If you create a table with a long name,
> PG truncates the name and creates a table with the shorter name; but
> if you refer to the table by the same long name, PG reports an error.

This seems odd, because the truncation happens in the scanner. Care to
provide a test case?

> (Very long names may show up in machine- generated schemas.) Would
> patches for this, e.g. to refuse to create a table with an impossible
> name, be welcome?

Tom Lane is opposed to this, although a number of people seem to like it.
Sounds like a configuration option to me.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Butler 2001-04-10 17:06:00 Re: Indexes not used in 7.1RC4: Bug?
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2001-04-10 16:41:59 RE: Truncation of char, varchar types