Re: RPMS for RC3

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RPMS for RC3
Date: 2001-04-09 16:44:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0104091835120.1255-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen writes:

> > You're still shipping old jar files. You could build them from the source
> > package.
>
> With which JDK? As Red Hat doesn't ship a _standard_ JDK, which one is
> appropriate? Or, what is the _standard_ JDK?

There is no standard JDK, in the same sense as there is no standard C
compiler. You run configure --with-java; make; make install and voilà
there's the JDBC driver, made by whatever JDK was around at the moment.
(For appropriate values of voilà, of course.) Most distributions include
Kaffe I suppose, which should serve fine (once you set up the CLASSPATH
correctly; YMMV).

> The man pages are still in a separate tarball, or not?

They're in a tarball, but they're not separate.

> > You probably want
> > to run gzip on the files after installation.
>
> Done automagically by the buildrootpolicy of the rpm build system,

Amazing... ;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message August Zajonc 2001-04-09 16:46:25 Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-04-09 16:28:53 Re: "--tuning" compile and runtime option (?)