| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |
| Date: | 2001-02-28 20:13:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102282108430.775-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> The "official" version of the story is that it takes ~10-20 hours for me
> to work through the docs to format them for hardcopy with ApplixWare,
Okay, I just kept hearing the "give Thomas 2 weeks for the docs" theme...
> primarily because something in the jade RTF tickles a bug in the page
> formatting with Applix. (This round, I'll resort even to M$Word to avoid
> that time sink, since I just don't have the time.)
Is that the same MS Word that generates Postscript files as a big bitmap?
I suppose by the time we release the 10th anniversary edition, the XML/XSL
architecture will be mature enough to produce printable files that way,
but until then -- whatever works.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-28 21:53:09 | Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-28 18:36:17 | Doesn't WAL fail at BLCKSZ = 32k? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-02-28 22:07:31 | Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-02-28 07:26:43 | Re: [ODBC] Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |