| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| Date: | 2001-01-19 16:16:12 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101191712530.1322-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> In looking at the VAX ASM problem, I realized that the ASM in s_lock.h
> is all formatted differently, making it even more confusing. I have
> applied the following patch to s_lock.h to try and clean it up.
I don't believe in this patch at all. It makes the assumption that all
assemblers have equally forgiving lexical rules as a certain subset of
said assemblers. For example, the VAX code does not look at all like the
one back when it still worked.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-19 16:23:00 | Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-01-19 16:16:00 | Re: 7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-19 16:40:54 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 2001-01-19 08:55:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2) |