Strange problem upgrading to 7.0.3x

From: Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Strange problem upgrading to 7.0.3x
Date: 2000-11-15 01:37:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0011141731420.18561-100000@salmo.appl-ecosys.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ever since I upgraded to 6.5.2 I've had problems upgrading to the 7.x
series. I'm running Red Hat 6.1 (2.2.17 kernel) on this box.

Now I'm trying to upgrade to 7.0.3 via the rpm. When I tried both the
freshen (-F) and upgrade (-U) switches, I found a failed dependency:
/lib/gcc! and a bunch of complaints that 6.5.2 needed some files being
replaced. So, the attempt failed.

I manually plucked all traces of the old 6.5.2 from the system and tried a
regular install:

[root(at)salmo rshepard]# rpm -ivh postgresql-7.0.3-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/lib/cpp is needed by postgresql-7.0.3-1
[root(at)salmo rshepard]# rpm -ivh --force postgresql-7.0.3-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/lib/cpp is needed by postgresql-7.0.3-1

Very strange! I _have_ /lib/cpp (for I've used it to build many
applications):

[root(at)salmo rshepard]# ls -l /lib/cpp
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 Nov 21 1999 /lib/cpp ->
../usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/cpp*

So, can someone please explain to me why the 7.0.3-1 package complains
that /lib/cpp isn't there when it is? FWIW, I got the same error when I
tried using the --force switch with rpm. Something's screwy here.

Thanks,

Rich

Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President

Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. (TM)
Making environmentally-responsible mining happen. (SM)
--------------------------------
2404 SW 22nd Street | Troutdale, OR 97060-1247 | U.S.A.
+ 1 503-667-4517 (voice) | + 1 503-667-8863 (fax) | rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Valter Mazzola 2000-11-15 01:44:59 eRserver.com Replication Server beta not available !?
Previous Message shawn everett 2000-11-15 00:55:55 Re: Stupid SQL Question: