Re: old pgindent change

From: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: old pgindent change
Date: 2003-09-22 22:59:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0309222353420.29572-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:

>
> There was a simple change commited in revision 1.47 of pgindent, listed as
> being "More updates for GNU indent".
>
> The questions are: why? and surely I can't be the only one whose hit this
> problem since November 2001?
>
> ...

I also had to apply the following change in order to avoid an awk compilation
error:

*** pgindent Mon Sep 22 23:54:40 2003
--- pgindent.new Mon Sep 22 23:54:27 2003
***************
*** 65,71 ****
line1 !~ "^typedef" &&
line1 !~ "^extern[ ][ ]*\"C\"" &&
line1 !~ "=" &&
! line1 ~ ")")
print "int pgindent_func_no_var_fix;";
line1 = line2;
}
--- 65,71 ----
line1 !~ "^typedef" &&
line1 !~ "^extern[ ][ ]*\"C\"" &&
line1 !~ "=" &&
! line1 ~ "\)")
print "int pgindent_func_no_var_fix;";
line1 = line2;
}

The changed line was also added in November 2001, in revision 1.48 this time.

awk -W version
mawk 1.3.3 Nov 1996, Copyright (C) Michael D. Brennan

and again with /bin/sh being a link to bash 2.03.0

--
Nigel J. Andrews

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-23 00:31:29 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-09-22 22:13:41 old pgindent change