Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-10 10:58:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0306101155470.2332-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
> > option that's supposed to let you turn off "Inserting missing FROM clause for
> > table ..."
>
> Bruce hasn't applied that patch yet. I believe he's starting to catch
> up the patch backlog today, though.
>

Are you sure about that? I seem to remember seeing the "will be applied within
24 hours" message a couple of weeks or so ago now. Is this a feature of the
recent system problems and lost patches are having to be reapplied?

As for it's name Josh, sorry, I don't have a record of my patch and the name
used in the patch differs to that which I have in my source tree.

--
Nigel Andrews

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgresql 2003-06-10 12:14:37 incremental backup
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-06-10 10:02:31 Re: host and hostssl equivalence in pg_hba.conf