| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg>, mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Indexes |
| Date: | 2003-01-16 22:05:02 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0301162203200.17547-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> > mlw said:
> >>> Does anyone think it would be a good idea, or is it even practical, to
> >>> have a 'indx' subdirectory along side of the 'base' directory?
> >>>
> >>> I was thinking that, if it were an easy modification, that it could be
> >>> an easy way to separate data and indexes to different hard disks.
>
> This and other quick hacks have been discussed before. I think the
> consensus has been to do nothing until someone gets around to writing
> a general-purpose tablespace implementation.
Wasn't someone just about done with a tablespace implementation? I certainly
remember some discussion on this subject a few months ago.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mlw | 2003-01-16 23:09:11 | Re: Oracle rant |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-16 21:59:58 | Re: Dropping OID column |