| From: | Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
| Date: | 2001-01-22 17:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0101221240490.3334-100000@olympus.scw.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> And this case can be handled within one database by having multiple
> schema, one for each package. It's not there yet, but it's a simpler
> solution than the generic solution. The problem (as others have mentioned)
> is that we don't want to open the door to remote access until we have a
> two-phase transaction commit mechanism in place. Doing it any other way
> is not a 'partial solution', it's a corrupt database waiting to happen.
What does '2-phase transaction commit mechanism' mean in this case?
--
Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-22 17:43:09 | Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-01-22 17:36:37 | Beta 3 question(s) |