Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...
Date: 2000-11-25 15:49:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011251643380.1028-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > I certainly don't like treating en_US specially, when in fact all locales
> > are affected by this.
>
> Well, my thought was that another locale, say en_FR, would be far more
> likely to be something that the system's user had explicitly chosen to
> use at some point,

IIRC, the default locale is chosen during the installation process of Red
Hat, so any locale is explicitly chosen. If Red Hat does not provide a
means to set the C locale as the default, that is Red Hat's fault. But
then it should also be Red Hat's job (and Red Hat's decision) to install
PostgreSQL in a certain way or other to account for that. Compiles from
source don't count here, those users enabled locale explicitly anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 2000-11-25 18:56:51 Re: Are pg_control contents really variable-length?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-25 15:43:14 Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...