Re: WAL fsync scheduling

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Date: 2000-11-18 18:26:09
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011181924080.1331-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman writes:

> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ?

Both of these signals are already used.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-18 18:51:02 Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-18 18:19:32 Re: WAL fsync scheduling