Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David J(dot) MacKenzie" <djm(at)web(dot)us(dot)uu(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Date: 2000-11-13 23:33:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011140032140.970-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > I am tempted to apply this. This is the second person who asked for
> > > binding to a single port. The patch looks quite complete, with doc
> > > changes. It appears to be a thorough job.
> >
> > Postmaster options are evil, please put something in backend/utils/guc.c.
> > (This is not the fault of the patch submitter, since this interface is new
> > for 7.1, but that still doesn't mean we should subvert it.)
>
> I have put code in guc.c to handle this, but there still are postmaster
> options for it too.

What happened to the concerns that were raised? The socket file is a lock
file, you cannot just move it around.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-13 23:40:07 Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-13 23:30:18 Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-13 23:40:07 Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-13 23:30:18 Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support