Re: Requests for Development

From: Andreas Tille <tillea(at)rki(dot)de>
To:
Cc: sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Requests for Development
Date: 2000-11-10 07:43:14
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011100838310.7464-100000@wr-linux02.rki.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Josh Berkus wrote:

> 2. Stored Procedure functionality, i.e. outputting a full recordset from
> a function (or new structure, if functions are hard to adapt) based on
> the last SELECT statement passed to the function. An alternative would
> be to develop parameterized views, which might be the easiest path.
I'm not really sure if parameterized views are a real alternative.
They would help in some cases, but *real* stored procedures would be
much more powerful. In my opinion it is also in the sense of easier
porting from databases to PostgreSQL to the benefit od PostgreSQL.

I wonder if there couldn't borrowed some code from Interbase which has
full featured stored procedures - at least it was told to me that it has ...

> 3. Slightly more informative syntax error messages - frankly, just
> grabbing a little more text around the word or punctuation that
> triggered the error would be enormously helpful (I can't tell you the
> number of times I've gotten "Error at or near ')'" in a huge DDL
> statement.
Waht about i18n. Could PostgreSQL sources gettext-ized?

> Thanks so much for your ongoing hard work!
Couldn'trepeated often enough alos for the past!

Kind regards

Andreas.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Roboul 2000-11-10 09:29:50 Re: Increasing the number of semaphores on FreeBSD 4.1 (clarification)
Previous Message Philip Hallstrom 2000-11-10 05:01:37 How to get postmaster to read it's new log file?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Dieringer 2000-11-10 08:26:17 Re: Requests for Development
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2000-11-09 20:40:00 Re: Requests for Development