Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h>
Date: 2000-10-24 16:09:14
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0010241807350.1165-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> After looking at this I'm confused again. The configure test
> consists of seeing whether cpp will process
>
> #include <netinet/tcp.h>
>
> without complaint. I can well believe that the full C compilation
> process will generate errors if <netinet/tcp.h> is included without
> also including <netinet/in.h>, but it's a little harder to believe
> that cpp alone will complain. Could you double-check this?

I'm not quite sure whether it explains it, but note that preprocessor
checks also "fail" when warnings are generated.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-24 16:12:20 Re: pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c xlogutils.c)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-24 16:06:48 Re: regress issues: UW7.1.1/PG7.1dev/GCC