Re: Re: JDBC Performance

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>, PGSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Date: 2000-10-09 16:38:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0010091737280.772-100000@maidast.demon.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On 5 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> >
> > > Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Anything of this nature always does.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Okay, I have some new code in place that hopefully should work better. I
> > > couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
> > > created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
> > > adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
> > > http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz
> >
> > Got it. Don't worry about the diff, I'll merge it in manually. At this
> > stage, it will be easier, and less prone to generating bugs with the
> > changes I've got here.
>
> OK, I can back it out in 5 minutes. It is very easy. Would you like it
> backed out?

If you could please, as it would make like easier for me to import my
changes, and also as Gunnar said, it's still being tested at the moment.

Thank, Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tamsin 2000-10-09 16:42:47 pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 16:27:10 Re: Re: JDBC Performance

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 16:48:24 Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 16:27:10 Re: Re: JDBC Performance