Re: JDBC problem

From: Cedar Cox <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>
To: Joachim Achtzehnter <joachim(at)kraut(dot)bc(dot)ca>
Cc: John McKown <jmckown(at)prodigy(dot)net>, BogdanKRomski <b(dot)kromski(at)gaschka(dot)pl>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC problem
Date: 2000-08-28 05:52:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0008280851590.22751-100000@nanu.visionforisrael.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:

> > On the other hand, holes in a sequence shouldn't be an issue for us so
> > 'no locking' would be just fine.
>
> The purpose of these sequences is to generate unique keys, therefore,
> holes don't matter.

Exactly. Thanks for the input..

-Cedar

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Santiago 2000-08-28 13:23:00
Previous Message Joachim Achtzehnter 2000-08-27 18:36:29 Re: JDBC problem