| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel(dot)Janik(at)linux(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal) |
| Date: | 2000-07-07 16:15:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0007062347420.4191-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner writes:
> >psql has \lo_import.
> This is true, but if there are 30000 blobs on an archive tape, I cant dump
> them into /tmp and wait for the user to run the script. At the current time
> pg_restore just sends a script to a file or stdout - it has no guarantee of
> when a \lo_import command will be run, so dumping blobs into the same file
> between lo_import calls would not be appropriate, since I am in effect
> requiring a psql attachment.
I don't understand. How else would you restore a large object if not using
libpq's lo_import() call?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-07-07 16:15:54 | Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-07 16:03:51 | Re: update on TOAST status' |