Re: SET FSYNC command?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET FSYNC command?
Date: 2000-05-31 18:44:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005312039360.701-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart writes:

> In this case, istm that
>
> SET FSYNC=ON;
>
> would be adequate and preferred; the "ENABLE" is implied by the "ON" in

Actually I just noticed that it actually is that way for FSYNC, but I
agree totally.

> the last example. I realize that you are using a keyword style already
> present, but perhaps for 7.1 we can shorten all of those keywords having
> "ENABLE_"?

You know me, I would change everything if you guys wouldn't hold me
back. :)

I could certainly agree to this.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff MacDonald 2000-05-31 19:00:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.0 weirdness
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-31 17:46:56 Re: config files in /data