| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
| Date: | 2000-01-29 11:16:35 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0001291215400.364-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-01-28, Tom Lane mentioned:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > I'd like to yank the END/ABORT commands, since they're non-standard and
> > redundant (COMMIT/ROLLBACK). Anyone who could not bear to see them go?
>
> Exactly what will this accomplish, other than breaking a lot of existing
> applications? (Including all of mine, which no doubt biases my thinking.)
Okay, I was just wondering. But I'm going to change all the notices and
docs to use commit and rollback instead.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-01-29 11:32:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-29 11:14:01 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check |