Re: full-text indexing

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full-text indexing
Date: 2000-04-19 03:21:31
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10004182320520.8997-100000@chapelperilous.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I agree! The last bit of advice given in the full text README. As I
> > said, I'd built full-text stuff for experimentation (I had maybe 30k of
> > raw text, which amounted to several 100,000 indexed entries), and I had
> > clustered it, and it was pretty darn fast, even on a Pentium 233 with only
> > 48 megs of RAM. I have significantly better hardware to run it on now.
> > The original project called MySQL, but it just didn't have what we needed
> > to put something like this together.
>
> With the original author, testing was fast, but when he loaded all the
> data, it got very slow. The problem was that as soon as his data
> exceeded the buffer cache, performance became terrible.

How much data are we talking here? How can one get around this buffer
cache problem?

Brett W. McCoy
http://www.chapelperilous.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Twenty two thousand days.
Twenty two thousand days.
It's not a lot.
It's all you've got.
Twenty two thousand days.
-- Moody Blues, "Twenty Two Thousand Days"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett W. McCoy 2000-04-19 03:45:12 Re: full-text indexing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-19 03:18:34 Re: full-text indexing