Re: To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Adam Ruth <aruth(at)intercation(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: To BLOB Or Not To BLOB
Date: 2000-04-17 19:29:06
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10004172028160.6375-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Adam Ruth wrote:

> > I'm using Linux and ext2fs has a 2GB limit on files, and it seems like
> > 6.5.3 tables are stored as single files, so better not go down that path
> :).
>
> I'm using 6.5.2 and it will split a table among several files, so that's not
> a problem. Though I'm not sure how BLOBs are stored since I never use them.

BLOBS are currently implemented as a table/index pair, so they will split
at the 1Gb mark as do normal tables.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jurgen Defurne 2000-04-17 19:33:44 Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Previous Message Hal Snyder 2000-04-17 19:10:05 excell to postgres