Re: [GENERAL] Simple problem?

From: <kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Stan Jacobs <jacobs(at)jtek(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Simple problem?
Date: 2000-03-02 17:21:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10003021109310.11416-100000@picasso.realtyideas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Stan Jacobs wrote:
>
> > 2. How do I get the order_id from the record I just wrote?
>
> You have to select it back out. A select on max(order_id) might do, but
> you might get caught if someone else does updates on your table as well. I
> am personally not so fond of serial columns because of this problem.
what? if you serial type, you can get it by curval(seqname) (see doc for
details). Peter, how can You make such a mistake :-) no sleep for a week?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wolfe 2000-03-02 18:18:01 Re: [GENERAL] Re: "LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock"
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-03-02 17:09:15 Re: [GENERAL] Simple problem?