Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date: 1999-05-18 05:59:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9905180653010.3493-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> ENHANCEMENTS
> ------------
> * Large objects
> * Fix large object mapping scheme, own typeid or reltype(Peter)
> * Allow large text type to use large objects(Peter)
> * not to stuff everything as files in a single directory

Hopefully when my workload eases (mid june ish) I'll be able to tackle
these again in earnest.

> * -delete orphaned large objects(Peter)

As I missed the 6.5beta deadline, I put the solution into contrib/lo

> * -Fix tables >2G, or report error when 2G size reached(Peter)
> (fix lseek()/off_t, mdextend()/RELSEG_SIZE)

This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables. I have the
general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.

peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-05-18 10:36:40 spinlock freeze again
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-05-18 03:43:07 Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo