From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list |
Date: | 1999-05-18 05:59:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9905180653010.3493-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> ENHANCEMENTS
> ------------
> * Large objects
> * Fix large object mapping scheme, own typeid or reltype(Peter)
> * Allow large text type to use large objects(Peter)
> * not to stuff everything as files in a single directory
Hopefully when my workload eases (mid june ish) I'll be able to tackle
these again in earnest.
> * -delete orphaned large objects(Peter)
As I missed the 6.5beta deadline, I put the solution into contrib/lo
> * -Fix tables >2G, or report error when 2G size reached(Peter)
> (fix lseek()/off_t, mdextend()/RELSEG_SIZE)
This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables. I have the
general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-05-18 10:36:40 | spinlock freeze again |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-05-18 03:43:07 | Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 release ToDo |