| From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Peter Garner <peter_garner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Interfaces List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ResultSet.getDate |
| Date: | 1999-02-01 16:42:45 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9902011639500.10499-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > I am thinking on re-working the date handling for PostgreSQL 6.5, as
> > I'm still seeing problems with them.
>
> Anything we should consider doing on the server side to help??
Not sure. The first thing I'm thinking of, is removing the datestyle
support, and having the driver set a datestyle to one (probably ISO)
during the connect. AFAIK, the ODBC driver uses a similar scheme?
This should reduce the size of the driver a little, and remove the number
of places where this error could occur.
If we still have problems, how about an internal datestyle for use by
interfaces only (like JDBC & ODBC)?
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-02-01 17:30:47 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ResultSet.getDate |
| Previous Message | Marcio Macedo | 1999-02-01 16:36:34 | Re: [INTERFACES] web interface for v.6.4.2 |