| From: | Kevin Heflin <kheflin(at)shreve(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgres DBA <postgres(at)nest(dot)bistbn(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PGSQL-General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] alter table ? |
| Date: | 1998-11-13 10:18:32 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.02.9811130417031.7549-100000@mercury.shreve.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Postgres DBA wrote:
> Yeah, that's true, but you can simply overcome this problem with following
> query that you should issue right after "alter" query:
> update passwd set spamblock='TRUE';
Yea, I did that, but I guess what I'm looking for, was that when ever
anything was added to the table. Regardless of whether or not the
spamblock was specified, it would be set to 'TRUE'
Kevin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Heflin | ShreveNet, Inc. | Ph:318.222.2638 x103
VP/Mac Tech | 333 Texas St #619 | FAX:318.221.6612
kheflin(at)shreve(dot)net | Shreveport, LA 71101 | http://www.shreve.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-11-13 10:51:59 | Re: [GENERAL] PL/pgSQL |
| Previous Message | Jeroen Schaap | 1998-11-13 09:45:19 | Update on: Failing lo_import on RH 5.1 -- postgresql-6.3.2 (please help-I'm on my knees..) |