From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
Date: | 1998-08-06 17:42:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980806184229.793L-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> > >
> > > I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> > > namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> > >
> > > However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> > > object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
> > > things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> > >
> > > Is is OK to rename them internally?
> >
> > Shouldn't be a problem. JDBC does refer to the xin prefix with the
> > getTables method, so it's simply a single change there.
>
> I am suggesting changes in later releases to older interfaces can
> communicated with 6.4 without any problems.
That sounds ok.
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brook Milligan | 1998-08-06 18:42:12 | Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 15:52:39 | current CVS tree |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Hartwig | 1998-08-06 17:44:18 | Re: [INTERFACES] Server-side cursors |
Previous Message | Karl Bolingbroke | 1998-08-06 16:05:44 | Server-side cursors |