Re: [HACKERS] Some performance issues (since everybody is testing ... :)

From: Costin Oproiu <co(at)deuroconsult(dot)ro>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some performance issues (since everybody is testing ... :)
Date: 1998-02-06 18:57:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980206205435.10162C-100000@linux.tpd.deuroconsult.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> >
> > Stressing postmaster with 100 connections
>
> Hi. Since you are testing with multiple connections, would you like to try additional testing to make sure the new deadlock
> detection code behaves properly, especially under heavy load/multiple connections?
>
> The large loading cases tend not to get exercised in beta testing because the systems are not in production yet...
>
> - Tom
>
OK, the title is a little bit misleading, it is about 100 successive
connections and wants to show how much time a trivial

"select 17"

coul take compare to a connection.

However your idea is very good, since I am dealing with benchmarking now.

.co.

Costin Oproiu ---------------- http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~co
Ciprian Porumbescu 10, ap.13 tel/fax: +(40)-68-183528
Brasov 2200, ROMANIA email: co(at)deuroconsult(dot)ro
--------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-06 19:12:47 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-06 18:01:31 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0