From: | Costin Oproiu <co(at)deuroconsult(dot)ro> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Some performance issues (since everybody is testing ... :) |
Date: | 1998-02-06 18:57:59 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.980206205435.10162C-100000@linux.tpd.deuroconsult.ro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > Stressing postmaster with 100 connections
>
> Hi. Since you are testing with multiple connections, would you like to try additional testing to make sure the new deadlock
> detection code behaves properly, especially under heavy load/multiple connections?
>
> The large loading cases tend not to get exercised in beta testing because the systems are not in production yet...
>
> - Tom
>
OK, the title is a little bit misleading, it is about 100 successive
connections and wants to show how much time a trivial
"select 17"
coul take compare to a connection.
However your idea is very good, since I am dealing with benchmarking now.
.co.
Costin Oproiu ---------------- http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~co
Ciprian Porumbescu 10, ap.13 tel/fax: +(40)-68-183528
Brasov 2200, ROMANIA email: co(at)deuroconsult(dot)ro
--------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-06 19:12:47 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-06 18:01:31 | Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |