From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Encoding names |
Date: | 2001-02-21 15:42:20 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1010221162237.22620O-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > As you probably know, there is already a binary search algorithm coded
> > > up for the date/time string lookups in utils/adt/datetime.c. Since that
> > > lookup caches the last value (which could be done here too) most lookups
> > > are immediate.
> > >
> > > Are you proposing to make a change Karel, or just encouraging others? :)
> > >
> >
> > No problem for me. Do you want patch with this to tommorow breakfast?
> > IMHO it's acceptable for current 7.1 too, it's really small change.
> >
> > Or do it Tatsuo?
>
> Please go ahead. By the way, there is one more place you need to tweak
> the encoding name table. Take a look at
> interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c. It's ugly to have simlilar tables in
> two places, but I did not find better way to avoid to link huge
> Unicode conversion tables in the frontend.
Hmm, I see. It's realy a little ugly maintain two places with same
things. What this solution:
* split (on backend) pg_conv_tbl[] into two tables:
encstr2enc[] - for encoding names (strings) to encode 'id'.
This table will sort by alphabet.
pg_conv_tbl[] - table with encoding 'id' and with encoding routines.
This table will order by encoding 'id' and this
order allows found relevant routines, an example:
pg_conv_tbl[ LATIN1 ]
This solution allows to use and share on libpq and backend one encstr2enc[]
table and basic functions those works with this table -- like
pg_char_to_encoding().
May be will better define for encoding 'id' separate enum datetype instead
current mistake-able '#define'.
Karel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-21 15:59:39 | Re: floating point representation |
Previous Message | Chris Storah | 2001-02-21 15:34:20 | low priority postmaster threads? |