| From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Schmidt, Peter" <peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com>, "'Michael Ansley'" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec-telecom-systems(dot)com>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: v7.1b4 bad performance |
| Date: | 2001-02-14 16:31:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.3.96.1010214172921.31439E-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Schmidt, Peter" <peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com> writes:
> > However, what I'm interested in is the comparison between 7.0x and 7.1x.
> > Shouldn't the 7.1b4 database be faster? Have you (or anyone else) done this
> > comparison?
>
> 7.1 is considerably faster if you compare performance without -F.
> If you are comparing performance with -F, I'm not sure exactly how it
> stacks up.
>
If I good remember, a compare is in some old Vadim's mail, -F is still
faster.
Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Schmidt, Peter | 2001-02-14 17:37:24 | RE: v7.1b4 bad performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-14 16:02:12 | Re: v7.1b4 bad performance |